PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.89%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 5.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.13%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-13.11%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 5.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.58%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 5.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-73.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-72.87%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-73.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.30%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.10%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
23.81%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
12.02%
OCF growth at 75-90% of INTC's 15.60%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
10.55%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
46.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 98.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
42.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 34.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
21.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 17.97%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
88.82%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with INTC's 89.23%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
100.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 27.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
61.14%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 27.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-36.54%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
47.24%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-55.69%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
44.34%
Below 50% of INTC's 101.28%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
6.56%
Below 50% of INTC's 43.00%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
5.71%
Below 50% of INTC's 25.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
516.71%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 141.84%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
193.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.16%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
82.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.75%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-18.91%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.57%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 0.78%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.21%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-5.64%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
13.79%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.93%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.58%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-0.73%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 11.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.