PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.04%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.29%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.32%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
297.09%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 748.33%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
294.29%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 733.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
297.06%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 720.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.20%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 2.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.20%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 9.76%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-42.35%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.64%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 6.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
56.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 105.64%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
47.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 35.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
27.80%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 27.50%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
134.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 251.26%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
247.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
94.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 44.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
178.55%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 282.16%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
324.95%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 130.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
121.24%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to INTC's 126.80%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
45.75%
Below 50% of INTC's 113.66%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
9.43%
Below 50% of INTC's 45.09%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
9.04%
Below 50% of INTC's 29.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
520.16%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 134.56%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
196.58%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.04%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
82.35%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 24.90%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
13.77%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.83%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 2.33%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.77%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.16%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.02%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 6.71%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-0.26%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
5.87%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 2.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.