PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.02%
Revenue growth similar to INTC's 5.58%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
7.03%
Gross profit growth similar to INTC's 7.07%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
10.15%
EBIT growth 50-75% of INTC's 17.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
10.59%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 17.96%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 12.39%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.62%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 13.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.70%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 12.90%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.61%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.80%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.21%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
64.21%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 17.97%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
70.86%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
61.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 119.57%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
48.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 41.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
31.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 31.59%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
375.35%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 221.33%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
205.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 68.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
135.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 120.59%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
222.83%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 283.30%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
140.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 168.01%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
113.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 89.37%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
43.90%
Below 50% of INTC's 112.75%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
8.47%
Below 50% of INTC's 39.31%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.29%
Below 50% of INTC's 24.28%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
520.27%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 114.52%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
121.41%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.49%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
81.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.05%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
6.67%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.85%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 2.77%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.83%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.54%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 0.37%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
24.23%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.26%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 1.81%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.85%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.