PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.07%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 12.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.06%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 18.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
12.90%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 39.37%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
13.14%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 39.37%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
11.74%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 27.81%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
12.59%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 29.63%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
12.86%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 31.43%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.80%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.16%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
15.33%
OCF growth at 75-90% of INTC's 19.18%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
10.08%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 72.88%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
69.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 129.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
48.57%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 54.77%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
30.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 37.49%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
169.40%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 229.25%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
106.95%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 67.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
57.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to INTC's 59.88%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
275.27%
Similar net income/share CAGR to INTC's 289.14%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
182.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 136.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
107.02%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to INTC's 113.57%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
40.20%
Below 50% of INTC's 125.04%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
7.63%
Below 50% of INTC's 40.38%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.99%
Below 50% of INTC's 29.93%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
518.41%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 114.80%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
121.07%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.38%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
82.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 24.99%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
2.19%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 17.71%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.24%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 0.78%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.25%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 1.80%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.29%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.02%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.56%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.69%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-10.20%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.