PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.77%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.16%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.48%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.73%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-21.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.65%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.92%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
24.31%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.18%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
1.85%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4.95%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
100.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 177.41%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
39.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 47.37%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
23.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 29.85%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
157.89%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 225.10%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
103.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 24.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
59.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 31.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1456.48%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 2615.44%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
176.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 116.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
57.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 49.25%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
29.63%
Below 50% of INTC's 133.32%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-5.16%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 39.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-4.04%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 26.71%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
601.64%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 115.07%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
157.27%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.35%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
102.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.33%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-23.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 23.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
4.77%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-7.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-13.04%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 4.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.02%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.56%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.15%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.55%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.