PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.81%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 16.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.64%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 14.35%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
4.17%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 39.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.51%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 39.64%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.20%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 43.34%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.14%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 44.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 46.74%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.31%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.08%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
10.91%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 41.18%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
21.89%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 49.74%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
75.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 157.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 46.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 31.13%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
220.59%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with INTC's 237.41%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
63.29%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 109.10%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
50.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 100.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
255.52%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 306.97%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
95.58%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to INTC's 100.70%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
57.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of INTC's 91.18%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
27.78%
Below 50% of INTC's 139.84%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-2.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 44.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.47%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 26.82%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
601.27%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 126.68%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
156.24%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.67%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
102.09%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.39%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-5.43%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 10.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.50%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.30%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.11%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.75%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.19%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-2.82%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-5.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.