PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.16%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 5.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.27%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 5.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.78%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.40%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.91%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 15.28%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 17.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-24.83%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 17.04%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.21%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
16.89%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-11.95%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.67%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
48.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 144.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
14.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 51.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 35.31%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
133.26%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 271.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
54.69%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 89.19%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
35.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to INTC's 33.01%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
117.46%
Below 50% of INTC's 287.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
45.49%
Below 50% of INTC's 108.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
9.10%
Below 50% of INTC's 112.52%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
21.96%
Below 50% of INTC's 137.69%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-3.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 53.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-9.21%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 28.30%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
651.36%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 125.06%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
165.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.68%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
79.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.10%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-19.97%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 11.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.91%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 1.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.14%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 2.06%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.66%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 6.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.20%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
1.85%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 5.49%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.26%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 3.77%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.