PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.63%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 1.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-2.53%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 3.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.40%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 3.55%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
9.72%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.53%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
10.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.53%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.21%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 4.66%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-51.48%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-56.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
37.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 149.52%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
18.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 72.41%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 48.37%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
58.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 95.66%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
56.76%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to INTC's 55.01%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
14.75%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 74.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
136.30%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 200.45%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
100.76%
Below 50% of INTC's 215.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
26.23%
Below 50% of INTC's 111.45%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
4.46%
Below 50% of INTC's 130.67%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-16.33%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 54.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 26.46%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
647.52%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 109.75%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
165.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 37.62%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
80.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.84%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
22.53%
AR growth well above INTC's 10.39%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.10%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 5.74%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.08%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 8.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-12.98%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
6.76%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 37.65%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-2.33%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
1.21%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.