PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.85%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
17.82%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
23.29%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.03%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-1.96%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.65%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2.03%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.22%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.13%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 1.46%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-16.10%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-18.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
31.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 119.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
23.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 43.66%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-0.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 27.08%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
41.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 204.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
13.88%
Below 50% of INTC's 61.65%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-9.71%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 46.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
103.37%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 92.63%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
88.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
13.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.99%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
7.90%
Below 50% of INTC's 108.08%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-7.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 48.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-18.37%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 17.65%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
644.90%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 113.11%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
163.60%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 39.60%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
79.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.98%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
18.37%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.00%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 3.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.37%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.79%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.01%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.85%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
1.50%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.