PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.23%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.71%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.51%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.95%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.85%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
3.83%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.33%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.32%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-12.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-19.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
60.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 105.84%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
55.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 67.15%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 41.11%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
353.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 85.83%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
269.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 59.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
77.37%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 1.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
233.16%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 42.97% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
169.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 91.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
36.82%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
21.69%
Below 50% of INTC's 126.56%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
13.46%
Below 50% of INTC's 51.88%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.85%
Below 50% of INTC's 31.07%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
677.64%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 90.81%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
167.94%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.77%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
64.02%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.14%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
12.02%
AR growth well above INTC's 6.28%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.32%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 0.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.49%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.30%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-12.21%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.52%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
6.78%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.