PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.78%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.01%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
15.16%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 50.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
14.13%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 50.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.15%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 50.58%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 50.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.63%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 51.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.21%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.10%
Similar dividend growth to INTC's 0.10%. Walter Schloss might see parallel free cash flow or payout philosophies.
14.65%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 57.64%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.52%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 320.52%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
65.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 0.72%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
52.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 69.42%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 32.89%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
320.99%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 192.43%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
115.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 165.67%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
22.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 35.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
259.89%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.91% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
156.30%
Below 50% of INTC's 344.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
45.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.08%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
28.12%
Below 50% of INTC's 132.19%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
21.70%
Below 50% of INTC's 62.17%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.02%
Below 50% of INTC's 39.67%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
686.53%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 94.81%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
168.06%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.56%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
64.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.64%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
0.44%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 3.50%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-1.80%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.91%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.64%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
9.59%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 6.95%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
0.02%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.30%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 2.54%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.