Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.

Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.02%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 45.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.

3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 23.01%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.01%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 71.54% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 51.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 43.03%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.

10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 64.64%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.

5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.36%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.

3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.47%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.

AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 12.58%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.

Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 9.98%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.

Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.26%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.68%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.

We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 6.47%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.

We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 16.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.