PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.51%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.75%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.63%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.40%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.95%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 75.49%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.03%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 74.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.96%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 75.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.11%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.21%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.20%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 4.98%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-9.04%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 1.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
58.23%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 159.62%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
94.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 74.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
55.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 43.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
38.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.84%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
491.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 142.92%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
191.60%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 74.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
97.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 30.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
928.53%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 263.14% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
138.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 216.93%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
83.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of INTC's 124.82%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
56.79%
Below 50% of INTC's 170.31%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 78.65%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
67.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 54.19%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
575.06%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 73.73%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
129.88%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.10%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
49.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.81%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
5.53%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.85%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 10.76%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.43%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 4.72%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.24%
50-75% of INTC's 7.85%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-5.65%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
0.51%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 7.73%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
4.46%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.