PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.26%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.32%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
5.90%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.24%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.09%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.20%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.81%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.33%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.43%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.04%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 0.29%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-17.54%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-31.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
93.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 39.00%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
52.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.22%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
44.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 1.11%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
224.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
108.31%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
0.26%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
536.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
134.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
78.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
56.50%
Below 50% of INTC's 154.17%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 69.44%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
69.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 47.11%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
573.58%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 73.71%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
129.97%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.80%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
49.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.47%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
22.01%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.75%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 2.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.19%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.86%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.88%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.87%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.