PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.56%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-0.22%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 16.97%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.70%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 75.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.65%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 75.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 324.45%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.21%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 327.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 327.27%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.76%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.75%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.09%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
56.45%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 855.50%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
68.74%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
91.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 38.28%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
37.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 8.12%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
42.33%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
184.81%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 82.21%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
73.82%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
42.20%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
262.30%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
93.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
64.93%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
57.46%
Below 50% of INTC's 145.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.87%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 60.30%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
65.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 43.46%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
570.52%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 61.98%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
129.76%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.80%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
49.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.55%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-6.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 23.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
9.32%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 5.40%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.40%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.60%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.73%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
9.57%
Debt growth far above INTC's 11.55%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
4.11%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.13%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.