PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.04%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 8.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-13.64%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 17.10%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.51%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 32412.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.97%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 32412.50%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-19.78%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 798.65%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.21%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 800.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 800.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.88%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-0.67%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
75.57%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
61.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 31.12%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
15.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
1.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
91.92%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-5.86%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-8.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
220.89%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.71% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
16.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-17.80%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
87.00%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 113.41%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
97.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 52.58%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
86.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.35%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
333.29%
Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
68.41%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
27.57%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while INTC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-9.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 19.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.33%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.24%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.45%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.60%
Under 50% of INTC's 3.56%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
5.05%
Debt growth far above INTC's 0.82%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-2.34%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 3.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-3.10%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 20.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.