PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.47%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 7.35%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.47%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 179.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-11.63%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 109.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-11.39%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 104.55%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.53%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 99.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.81%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 99.25%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.56%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 99.25%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.11%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.58%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
15.36%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
93.75%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
40.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.96%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
22.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-15.98%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
80.26%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
16.53%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-14.12%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
67.62%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
15.21%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-42.90%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
86.70%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with INTC's 96.21%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
94.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.08%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
28.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
299.73%
Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
50.84%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
18.30%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while INTC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-7.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 11.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.38%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 1.13%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.53%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 1.52%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-2.01%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-6.71%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.20%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.21%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.