PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.73 | 5.46
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.31%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.33%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
14.74%
Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.05%
Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.84%
Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.85%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
10.16%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.22%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.44%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.02%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
119.08%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 20.82%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
302.55%
FCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 34.48%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
56.74%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
38.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 21.22%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-13.53%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
158.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 313.43%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
9.09%
Below 50% of LSCC's 140.45%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
6.59%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
111.90%
Similar net income/share CAGR to LSCC's 106.98%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-5.33%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-42.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
83.06%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 62.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
116.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 85.58%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
17.94%
Below 50% of LSCC's 57.97%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
297.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 297.32% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
51.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 51.38% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
18.05%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.05% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-36.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSCC shows 1.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.67%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.48%
Positive asset growth while LSCC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.20%
Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
9.30%
We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.93%
R&D dropping or stable vs. LSCC's 5.18%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
2.75%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 5.09%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.