205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.95%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
6.95%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-383.16%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-383.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
90.00%
Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.51%
Slight or no buybacks while LSCC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.51%
Slight or no buyback while LSCC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
100.00%
Dividend growth of 100.00% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.74%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
8.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 21.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
8.74%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 106.98% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
163.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
163.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
19.04%
Below 50% of LSCC's 62.98%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
19.04%
Below 50% of LSCC's 85.58%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.04%
Below 50% of LSCC's 57.97%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.