205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.36%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
8.36%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-371.30%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-371.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
37.50%
Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.33%
Slight or no buybacks while LSCC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.33%
Slight or no buyback while LSCC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.05%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
22.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to LSCC's 21.22%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
22.05%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
280.11%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 106.98% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
280.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
280.11%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
16.20%
Below 50% of LSCC's 62.98%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
16.20%
Below 50% of LSCC's 85.58%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
16.20%
Below 50% of LSCC's 57.97%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-46.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-46.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-46.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.