205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.27%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 16.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.27%
Gross profit growth under 50% of LSCC's 16.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-368.46%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 16.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-368.46%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 16.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.71%
Net income growth of 1.71% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.11%
Share change of 1.11% while LSCC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.11%
Diluted share change of 1.11% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.19%
10Y CAGR of 31.19% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
31.19%
5Y CAGR of 31.19% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
31.19%
3Y CAGR of 31.19% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.31%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 317.31% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
317.31%
Net income/share CAGR of 317.31% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
317.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 317.31% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
13.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.09% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
13.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.09% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
13.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.09% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-46.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-46.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-46.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.