PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.63%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-5.63%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
137.71%
Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
137.71%
Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-11.23%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-14.29%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 203.03%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-14.29%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 203.03%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.68%
10Y CAGR of 30.68% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
30.68%
5Y CAGR of 30.68% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
30.68%
3Y CAGR of 30.68% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
709.89%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 709.89% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
709.89%
Net income/share CAGR of 709.89% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
709.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 709.89% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.