PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.82%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 33.77%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
177.57%
Positive gross profit growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
251.26%
Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
251.26%
Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-44.77%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-60.00%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 34.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-60.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 34.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
19.85%
Share change of 19.85% while LSCC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
19.85%
Diluted share change of 19.85% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
58.73%
Dividend growth of 58.73% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 77.59%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
39.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 77.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
28.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 77.59%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.25%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
179.25%
Net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
24.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 24.43% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
57.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 57.92% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
57.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 57.92% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
32.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 32.66% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-14.28%
Cut dividends over 10 years while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-14.28%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-14.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.15%
AR growth of 4.15% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-9.16%
Inventory is declining while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.64%
Asset growth of 2.64% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-15.87%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2.31%
Debt growth of 2.31% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.37%
SG&A growth of 0.37% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.