PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.37%
Negative revenue growth while LSCC stands at 27.18%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-66.29%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 24.59%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-101.44%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 31.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-101.44%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 31.58%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-63.79%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 42.11%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-65.00%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 602.99%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-65.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 602.99%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.12%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.12%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
3.02%
Dividend growth of 3.02% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-74.43%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1004.76%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
24.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 129.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
24.33%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 129.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
13.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 129.82%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
192.70%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 192.70% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
192.70%
Net income/share CAGR of 192.70% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-83.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.60% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSCC shows 17.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.52%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 28.13%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.34%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 13.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.80%
Under 50% of LSCC's 9.93%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.50%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSCC's 27.03%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.