PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.65%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 26.72%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
12.33%
Gross profit growth under 50% of LSCC's 28.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1050.00%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 56.00%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1050.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 56.00%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-15.38%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 7.41%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 15.91%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 15.91%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.74%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 27.78%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
20.39%
FCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 47.62%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
18.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 186.42%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
18.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 186.42%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 186.42%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-78.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
63.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 63.51% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.33%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. LSCC's 35.29%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
3.96%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 2.44%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.15%
Asset growth well under 50% of LSCC's 15.69%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.58%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.84%
We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSCC's 12.77%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.