PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.53%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 8.43%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-4.88%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 8.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-115.79%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 5.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-115.79%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 5.13%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-163.64%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 13.79%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-220.00%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-220.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.25%
Share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 0.54%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.25%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 0.54%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-4.40%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-112.40%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 32.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-101.65%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 41.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
29.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 208.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
29.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 208.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
12.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 208.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.23%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
92.23%
Net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-111.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.31% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.82%
AR growth well above LSCC's 4.35%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.34%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.77%
Asset growth well under 50% of LSCC's 59.32%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.22%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 78.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
16.84%
We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSCC's 9.43%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.