PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.70%
Positive revenue growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
171.79%
Positive gross profit growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-1233.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1233.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-700.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-445.24%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-445.24%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.04%
Share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 0.08%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 0.08%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.04%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3256.25%
Positive OCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
223.77%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
34.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 112.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
34.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 112.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 112.86%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-25.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-169.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
52.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 52.64% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
52.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 52.64% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
31.37%
Equity/share CAGR of 31.37% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-15.63%
Cut dividends over 10 years while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.63%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.25%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.25% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.11%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.00%
Inventory is declining while LSCC stands at 39.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.45%
Asset growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 1.99%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-3.32%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.34%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
We expand SG&A while LSCC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.