PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.37%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 10.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-7.67%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 13.95%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-217.14%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-217.14%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-190.74%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-160.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-160.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.49%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.49%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
402.45%
Dividend growth of 402.45% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-59.18%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 35.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
0.93%
FCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 170.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
30.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 192.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
30.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 192.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
8.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 192.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1331.05%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1331.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-271.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
857.05%
Dividend/share CAGR of 857.05% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
857.05%
Dividend/share CAGR of 857.05% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
786.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 786.16% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.53%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-4.17%
Inventory is declining while LSCC stands at 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.07%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 1.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.85%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 3.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.44%
We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.77%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 6.78%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.