PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.77%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 6.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.40%
Gross profit growth under 50% of LSCC's 9.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
45.05%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 17.86%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
45.05%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 17.86%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
28.03%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 12.50%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
23.08%
EPS growth of 23.08% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth of 23.08% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-5.09%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.09%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-29.19%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-105.00%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 52.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
1.87%
FCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 38.10%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
44.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 209.01%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
38.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 209.01%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 209.01%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-921.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-229.33%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
577.65%
Dividend/share CAGR of 577.65% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
527.45%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 527.45% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.20%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.72%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.68%
Asset growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 2.88%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
15.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.91%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-8.56%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.90%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 7.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.