PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.12%
Positive revenue growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
223.36%
Gross profit growth of 223.36% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
31.15%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.03%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
31.15%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.03%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
24.78%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.70%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
37.80%
EPS growth of 37.80% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
37.80%
Diluted EPS growth of 37.80% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
14.90%
Share count expansion well above LSCC's 0.54%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
14.90%
Diluted share count expanding well above LSCC's 0.54%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-75.13%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
35000.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 45.71%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
321.90%
FCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 51.72%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
28.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 156.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 156.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC stands at 156.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-387.17%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-184.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
21.11%
Equity/share CAGR of 21.11% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
1.73%
Equity/share CAGR of 1.73% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
7.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 7.09% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-15.75%
Cut dividends over 10 years while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.75%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.02%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.02% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-12.39%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSCC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.12%
Inventory is declining while LSCC stands at 13.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.55%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 6.68%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-20.60%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 4.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.73%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.90%
We expand SG&A while LSCC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.