PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.31%
Negative revenue growth while LSCC stands at 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-58.24%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 8.41%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
250.00%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 8.82%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
250.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 8.82%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
147.06%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 10.71%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
148.23%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 585.07%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
148.23%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 585.07%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-29.30%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-29.30%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
53.23%
Dividend growth of 53.23% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-97.71%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-130.90%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
85.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 174.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
69.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 174.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
41.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 174.07%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
484.92%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 484.92% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-31.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-36.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 158.20% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
139.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 139.08% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.22%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. LSCC's 40.32%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.84%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-6.19%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 4.44%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
37.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSCC's 5.15%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.77%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.17%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 7.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.