PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.21%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 11.96%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
21.35%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 12.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
103.17%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 16.22%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
103.17%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 16.22%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
80.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 9.68%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
66.67%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
66.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
30.34%
Share count expansion well above LSCC's 1.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
30.34%
Diluted share count expanding well above LSCC's 1.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-26.23%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
1562.50%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 73.08%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
163.89%
FCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 94.12%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
44.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 245.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
33.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 245.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 121.58%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
461.80%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 461.80% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
43.62%
Net income/share CAGR of 43.62% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-30.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 90.48% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.37%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
76.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
25.69%
AR growth well above LSCC's 2.30%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-2.17%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
7.24%
Asset growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.94%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-21.23%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.09%
We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.56%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSCC's 9.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.