PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 13.28%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
134.81%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 11.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-2.59%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 14.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.59%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 14.81%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
35.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 12.20%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
25.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 17.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 17.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
19.32%
Slight or no buybacks while LSCC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
19.32%
Slight or no buyback while LSCC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-12.55%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
14.29%
OCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 40.58%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
6.22%
FCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 42.50%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
38.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 296.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 296.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-0.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC stands at 123.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.25%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 10.25% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
258.23%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 258.23% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
99.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to LSCC's 103.82%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
15.18%
Equity/share CAGR of 15.18% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
-0.88%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while LSCC is at 181.66%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-19.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
48.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 48.99% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-6.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-12.16%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSCC shows 3.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-8.02%
Inventory is declining while LSCC stands at 63.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of LSCC's 13.61%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-18.17%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 9.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.05%
We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSCC's 10.47%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.