PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.73%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 6.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
14.88%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 6.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
23.57%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 13.04%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
23.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 13.04%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
38.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 7.55%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
60.00%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
60.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-10.96%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 6.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-10.96%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 6.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
22.52%
Dividend growth of 22.52% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
121.15%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 29.03%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
219.05%
FCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 480.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
57.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 426.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
30.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 426.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
32.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 83.98%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.94%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
747.03%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 747.03% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
18.05%
Net income/share CAGR of 18.05% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
921.88%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 80.26%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.89%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while LSCC is at 193.81%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
77.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 77.23% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
64.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.10% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
0.36%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 0.36% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.67%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.00%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 28.15%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.34%
Asset growth well under 50% of LSCC's 6.52%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
18.75%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSCC's 0.56%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.71%
We’re deleveraging while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.28%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 2.73%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.