PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.49%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 9.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.95%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 9.95%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
39.71%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 12.16%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
39.71%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 12.16%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
37.31%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 7.14%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.82%
Share count expansion well above LSCC's 1.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.55%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 1.33%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.81%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-29.54%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 111.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.21%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 147.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
65.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 409.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.07%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 226.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
26.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 74.43%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1140.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 346.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1129.69%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1129.69% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
52.11%
Net income/share CAGR of 52.11% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
199.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 125.33%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.43%
Below 50% of LSCC's 81.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
10.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 10.94% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
2.72%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2.72% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-88.41%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
7.11%
AR growth well above LSCC's 13.68%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.86%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.78%
Asset growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 6.78%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
6.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSCC's 4.13%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.41%
We’re deleveraging while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 155.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.