PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.08%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 4.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
4.16%
Gross profit growth similar to LSCC's 4.07%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
2800.34%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 5.62%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
2800.34%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 5.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
1.08%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 7.81%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above LSCC's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.83%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.28%
Dividend growth of 4.28% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
8.56%
Positive OCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
11.00%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
87.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 379.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
34.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 170.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
46.44%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 87.33%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.37%
OCF/share CAGR of 30.37% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
13.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 11.56%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
473.10%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 473.10% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
370.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 178.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
303.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 122.55%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
73.62%
Equity/share CAGR of 73.62% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
9.94%
Below 50% of LSCC's 314.94%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
43.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 84.89%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-25.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-13.13%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-11.62%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-1.10%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
1.38%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 7.41%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of LSCC's 4.77%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.88%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 4.96%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-4.09%
We’re deleveraging while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.96%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 3.28%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.