PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.88%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 11.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
27.53%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 9.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-95.92%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 11.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-95.92%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 11.70%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
22.34%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 11.59%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
36.36%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 341.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 341.33%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 1.09%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.28%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 3.68%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.19%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-45.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-90.99%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
103.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 436.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
63.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 133.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 95.67%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.26%
Positive OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1795.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1540.34%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1540.34% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1453.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 116.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
274.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 121.90%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.10%
Below 50% of LSCC's 300.30%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.87%
Below 50% of LSCC's 86.48%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.83%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-42.43%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
15.40%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.03%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.18%
Asset growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 8.37%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
7.50%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 6.05%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
3.05%
Debt growth of 3.05% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.