PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.76%
Negative revenue growth while LSCC stands at 2.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.84%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 2.81%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-64.30%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-51.83%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-43.99%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 9.01%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-38.89%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 300.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-38.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 300.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.06%
Share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 0.44%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 2.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-3.09%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-113.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-8871.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
86.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 502.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 158.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
36.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 30.26%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is at 72.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-166.68%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1100.28%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1100.28% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
350.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to LSCC's 333.39%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
93.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 75.63%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.91%
Below 50% of LSCC's 255.61%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
101.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 133.36%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 6.40% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
40.10%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.10% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.06%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
1.41%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.01%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 4.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.26%
50-75% of LSCC's 4.46%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
37.42%
Debt growth of 37.42% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.28%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 2.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.