PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.46%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 10.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
25.99%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 11.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
51.31%
Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
54.85%
Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.41%
Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
31.25%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.26%
Share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 1.52%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.57%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 1.52%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
2.76%
Dividend growth of 2.76% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
42.40%
OCF growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 66.67%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
260.00%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
18.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 361.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-12.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while LSCC stands at 41.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC stands at 16.23%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is at 84.62%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
77.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to LSCC's 71.20%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
150.39%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 150.39% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
64.61%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
310.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 171.52%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
48.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 38.47%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
88.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 88.55% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
83.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 83.56% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-0.18%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
18.90%
AR growth well above LSCC's 35.71%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.49%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 37.85%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-0.61%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 59.88%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.37%
Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.08%
We’re deleveraging while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
17.36%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. LSCC's 11.24%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.02%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSCC's 13.68%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.