PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.12%
Positive revenue growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.17%
Positive gross profit growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
10.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.17%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSCC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
13.43%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.33%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 272.41%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.70%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 272.41%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
2.53%
Share count expansion well above LSCC's 0.27%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above LSCC's 0.27%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.49%
Dividend growth of 0.49% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
83.58%
OCF growth of 83.58% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
152.78%
FCF growth of 152.78% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
12.26%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-16.56%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
101.94%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
153.21%
OCF/share CAGR of 153.21% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
94.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 94.23% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
34.58%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 34.58% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
882.41%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
108.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1537.14%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
188.07%
Equity/share CAGR of 188.07% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
162.02%
Equity/share CAGR of 162.02% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
99.34%
Equity/share CAGR of 99.34% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
10.49%
Dividend/share CAGR of 10.49% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
27.18%
Dividend/share CAGR of 27.18% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-6.24%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-5.96%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSCC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
18.73%
Inventory growth of 18.73% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
13.87%
Asset growth of 13.87% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
13.93%
BV/share growth of 13.93% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-0.91%
We’re deleveraging while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.71%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
28.49%
We expand SG&A while LSCC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.