PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.29%
Positive revenue growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
17.45%
Positive gross profit growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
99.20%
Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
99.20%
Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
269.42%
Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
271.43%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
257.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.54%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
3.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above LSCC's 0.30%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.54%
Dividend growth of 0.54% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
34.92%
Positive OCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
28.24%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-3.87%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
8.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-19.76%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
64.67%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-17.74%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
4.61%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
151.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
147.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-34.10%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
308.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 265.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
72.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 17.17%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-8.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while LSCC is at 35.37%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
31.93%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.93% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.18%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
5.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 5.82% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.69%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-0.50%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.09%
Positive asset growth while LSCC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.01%
Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.68%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.38%
We increase R&D while LSCC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-4.57%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.