PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.39%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.03%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.89%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.24%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
24.89%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.24%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
20.16%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.42%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
19.05%
EPS growth above 1.5x LSCC's 6.67%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
19.05%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x LSCC's 6.67%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.79%
Share count expansion well above LSCC's 0.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-1.12%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.76%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
28.75%
Positive OCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1975.00%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 21.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
61.53%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
45.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
48.79%
Positive OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-12.33%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 190.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
99.88%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
21.43%
Below 50% of LSCC's 73.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
327.27%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
287.62%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 179.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
68.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 3.03%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-0.31%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
81.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 81.51% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.12%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
1.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.53% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
15.02%
AR growth well above LSCC's 11.24%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.93%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.68%
Positive asset growth while LSCC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.11%
Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.70%
We’re deleveraging while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.05%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. LSCC's 1.53%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.93%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 7.50%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.