PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.73%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 1.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
1.31%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-2.41%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-2.41%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-70.59%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-69.48%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-69.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.03%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.09%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.93%
Dividend growth of 0.93% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-34.43%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 191.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-46.04%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 6006.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
57.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 2.08%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
125.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 4.34%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 21.57%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
176.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 84.12%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
39.23%
Below 50% of LSCC's 5606.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-6.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 4775.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
581.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
765.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 100.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
79.28%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of LSCC's 104.01%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
194.56%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 22.52%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
15.59%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
20.14%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
40.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 40.48% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
37.98%
Dividend/share CAGR of 37.98% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
41.93%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.93% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.29%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.69%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 2.22%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-7.18%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.02%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. LSCC's 1.65%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.35%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 4.92%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.