PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.92%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-9.52%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-17.63%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-17.63%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-4.84%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 4.46%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.13%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.52%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.41%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
29.35%
Dividend growth of 29.35% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
101.67%
Positive OCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
341.26%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
204.26%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
111.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 13.24%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
120.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 43.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
37.20%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
18.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
39.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2571.27%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
727.64%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 107.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
129.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 102.68%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
187.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 18.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
4.23%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
69.04%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
87.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 87.75% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
75.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 75.60% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
184.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 184.42% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-15.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-3.62%
Inventory is declining while LSCC stands at 6.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-5.78%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 4.11%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.10%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.46%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.39%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 21.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.