Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 1.80% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 83.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 14.40%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 91.76% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 106.54% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 88.39% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Firm’s AR is declining while LSCC shows 27.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

Inventory is declining while LSCC stands at 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Our R&D shrinks while LSCC invests at 20.59%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.