Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Positive revenue growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 0.53% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

OCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.60%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 70.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 30.83%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 3.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 288.56% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 278.60% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 286.61% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.