PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.92%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.87%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.71%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.18%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.45%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
25.02%
Dividend growth of 25.02% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.05%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 38.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-9.93%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 87.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
66.42%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
96.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
41.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 7.52%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
241.13%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
127.23%
Below 50% of LSCC's 1443.34%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
37.02%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 125.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
401.02%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
252.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
93.61%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
91.65%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
10.40%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.05%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
361.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.20% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
355.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 355.42% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
294.10%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 294.10% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.89%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.21%
Inventory is declining while LSCC stands at 9.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.70%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.50%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.09%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.