PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.41%
Revenue growth similar to LSCC's 2.61%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-0.40%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 3.45%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
3.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 37.03%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSCC's 37.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-11.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.20%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.53%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.52%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.23%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-19.03%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 81.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-41.00%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 132.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
83.22%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
87.61%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
27.99%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 9.21%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
99.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
79.80%
Positive OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-22.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 304.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1239.80%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
536.36%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 22.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
15.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
98.52%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
19.49%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
7.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
373.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 373.94% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
367.18%
Dividend/share CAGR of 367.18% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
298.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 298.29% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.51%
AR growth well above LSCC's 1.45%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.63%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.36%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 0.32%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
1.83%
Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.06%
Our R&D shrinks while LSCC invests at 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.61%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 1.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.