PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.26%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-26.53%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
22.34%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 19.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
-80.00%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 19.97%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-84.11%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 60.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-88.89%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 58.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-88.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 58.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.47%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.62%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.47%
Dividend growth of 0.47% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-77.55%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 316.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-80.02%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 3336.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
28.28%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-3.43%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.22%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
45.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-13.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-43.98%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 311.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-91.64%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-93.70%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 66.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.39%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
72.90%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
3.59%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1.88%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
435.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 435.74% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
417.97%
Dividend/share CAGR of 417.97% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
265.17%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 265.17% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
23.22%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-20.15%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.78%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.44%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-15.75%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.