PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.79%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 8.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
39.45%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 8.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
272.17%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 48.07%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
3330.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 48.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
1429.41%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 52.71%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
2000.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x LSCC's 52.81%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1900.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x LSCC's 52.81%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.63%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.39%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.80%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
121.91%
OCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 349.44%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
144.71%
FCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 378.19%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
29.78%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
5.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-18.54%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
128.04%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 2.13%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
53.26%
Below 50% of LSCC's 466.38%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
6.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 531.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-0.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is at 95.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.92%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 83.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-86.65%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
73.41%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
3.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-11.69%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
417.19%
Dividend/share CAGR of 417.19% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
423.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 423.04% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
262.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 262.50% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
10.58%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.19%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.09%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.66%
Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.40%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.21%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 4.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.